President Theodore Roosevelt, a saccharin consumer, objects to the investigation. Monsanto flourishes under the protection of high U. One of its products, styrene, will become critical to the U.
Later, the company acquires the Jacob Hartz Seed Co. The company also signs contracts to license corn and soybean seeds from DeKalb Genetics and buys the cotton and biotech company Agracetus. A sign reading "Businesses for ," supports a ballot initiative in Washington state that would require labeling of foods containing genetically modified crops, at the Central Co-op in Seattle, Washington October 29, The company urgently needed a strategy to negotiate this hurdle and prolong the useful life of its 'cash cow'.
Much of the rest of its chemicals division was spun off in late as Solutia, as already noted. This helped Monsanto distance itself to some extent not only from direct financial liability for the historical core of its business but also from its controversial production and contamination legacy. By the current Monsanto had emerged from various transactions, including a merger for a time with Pharmacia, as a legally different corporation from the Monsanto that had existed from This was depite the fact that both Monsantos shared not just the same name, but the same corporate headquarters near St.
Louis, Missouri, and many of the same executives and other employees, not to mention much of the responsibility for liabilities arising out of its former activities. As Monsanto had moved into biotechnology, its executives had the opportunity to create a new narrative for the company. They begun to portray genetic engineering as a ground-breaking technology that could contribute to feeding a hungry world. Monsanto executive Robb Fraley, who was head of the plant molecular biology research team, is also said to have hyped the potential of GM crops within the company, as a once-in-a-generation opportunity for Monsanto to dominate a whole new industry, invoking the monopoly success of Microsoft as a powerful analogy.
Monsanto eventually achieved this by introducing into crop plants genes that give resistance to glyphosate the active ingredient in Roundup. This meant farmers could spray Roundup onto their fields as a weedkiller even during the growing season without harming the crop. Although the first of Monsanto's biotech products to make it to market was not a GM crop but Monsanto's controversial GM cattle drug, bovine growth hormone — called rBGH or rBST, Monsanto's corporate strategy led them for the first time to acquire seed companies.
It has purchased, for example, Holden's Foundations Seeds, Seminis — the largest seed company not producing corn or soybeans in the world, the Dutch seed company De Ruiter Seeds, and the big cotton seed firm Delta and Pine. As a result, Monsanto is now the world's largest seed company, accounting for almost a quarter of the global proprietary seed market. Herbicides account for about one-third of the global pesticide market.
Monsanto's glyphosate-resistant Roundup Ready seeds have reigned supreme on the biotech scene for over a decade — creating a near-monopoly for the company's Roundup herbicide — which is now off patent.
Roundup is the world's biggest selling pesticide and it has helped make Monsanto the world's fifth largest agrochemical company. This concentration of corporate power drives up costs for farmers and consumers. And this concentration again drives up costs. According to Keith Mudd of the U. Let's say a farmer in Iowa who farms 1, acres plants one of these expensive corn varieties next year.
Yet there's no scientific basis to justify this price hike. How can we let companies get away with this? Patenting also inhibits public sector research and further undermines the rights of farmers to save and exchange seeds. Monsanto devotes an annual budget of 10 million dollars to harassing, intimidating, suing — and in some cases bankrupting — American farmers over alleged improper use of its patented seeds.
Recent price hikes have taken place in the context of a global food crisis marked by rapid food price inflation, which has exacerbated extreme poverty and hunger, and increased social tensions. By , Monsanto was a publically traded company, with its primary businesses in agriculture and biotechnology.
It acquired several seed and software companies during the early s. That deal was finalized in , and Bayer announced the company would continue on under the Bayer name. When Bayer announced its intention in to buy Monsanto, it was thought to be to boost agricultural research and innovation. Along with the finalization of the sale, Bayer announced that the name Monsanto would be dropped, but all acquired products would keep their brand names.
This may have been a strategic way to distance them from the negative association that had developed between the name Monsanto and genetically modified organisms and genetically engineered seeds.
The deal was quite controversial for many reasons. It worried consumers because with Bayer buying Monsanto, competition in the crop market—and, more important for consumers, the products made with those crops—became even less, foreshadowing price increases for bread, cereal, and other staples made from grains. In addition, Monsanto had become fairly synonymous with pesticides, Roundup in particular, and seeds genetically modified to be resistant to glyphosate the main ingredient in Roundup , spurring fears that even more pesticide residues would collect on crops and wind up in our food.
Mainstream commercial farmers were also concerned due to the merger meaning even less competition for seed prices. And finally, anti-trust lobbyists were quite concerned. With the purchase of Monsanto, Bayer gained control of more than 30 percent of the seed market. The next largest controlled 18 percent, with the third largest controlling a bit over 9 percent, so 30 percent, by comparison, is a huge piece of the industry.
Monsanto is no stranger to lawsuits on both sides of the table: as defendant and plaintiff. The main ingredient in Roundup is glyphosate.
It was discovered by a chemist at Monsanto in , and they began selling it commercially for agricultural use in It is an herbicide used to kill weeds. Farmers found it useful, especially when Monsanto later introduced glyphosate-resistant crops—meaning, crops genetically engineered to resist being harmed or killed by Roundup, so the farmers could use it to kill the weeds but not harm their crops.
By , Roundup was the most used herbicide in the United States—being used on farms, by homeowners, and in government and industry. The Environmental Protection Agency estimates that million pounds of glyphosate is applied to lawns and crops in the United States every year.
Some environmental and wildlife studies and concerns surrounding the manufacture and use of glyphosate are:. You will never be charged a fee unless a recovery is made for you. History of Monsanto. Bayer Purchases Monsanto When Bayer announced its intention in to buy Monsanto, it was thought to be to boost agricultural research and innovation.
Nevertheless, the sale was finalized in Monsanto Lawsuits Monsanto is no stranger to lawsuits on both sides of the table: as defendant and plaintiff. Here is a brief, non-inclusive list of lawsuits in which Monsanto was the defendant: A class action lawsuit was filed against Monsanto for injuries sustained by military personnel exposed to the defoliant Agent Orange in Vietnam.
Agent Orange contained dioxin, which is associated with many adverse health effects, including cancer and infertility. Monsanto settled the suit.
0コメント